Alex+Huang+Persuasive+essay

Lastly, I think that violence in video games lead to more youth violence because the games can influence them to be violent because it could help them solve their problems faster or easier. I think if they stop making games it would help the world because there will be less crime and the crime rates would drop. Sometimes games anger people when they lose and they will get angry and maybe that is why we have so many crime rates in New York. I also think that games could be fun because it is fiction and people play these when they are bored and not all games influence people to do crimes. I think that games could do both it can be for bad or good but it depends on how the person acts toward the game. For my first main point video games do not increase violence because video games are for fun. Video games are for fun because they are fictional and people play to get stress off of them. People buy violence games because its fun and you can't do this in real life. That is why violence games are the most sold because it's fun and not everyone will turn bad after they play it because it depends on your personality and how you act when you play a game. Games are suppose to be fun to play and it is not suppose to be for bad. This my second main point because studies shows that games does influence kids to be violent when the play a violent game. I know this because they test it out by making people playing violent games and people playing non violent games. For example on 2008 study shows that grand theft childhood reported that 60% of middle schools boys that play at least m rated games hit or beat up somebody. Compared to 39% of boys that did not play rated M games. This is my information that show that some kids do become violent play these games. This shows us that violence influence kids to do bad things in real life. For my third main point i think that students should not play video games because people that are selling these games are only doing this for money. Industries that make these games are basically marketing, murder they just sell these games for money and I think that they don't cared if they influence kids at all. I think that if there are no video games there would be less murder in New York City. So this shows that if there was less violence games there will be less murder. My counter argument number 1 us that games are made to be played for entertainment. This is my rubuttal to that is that studies show that games can influence kids to solve there problems by doing the bad things. I got this evidence from the website called serendip.brymawr.edu. My counter argument number 2 is that we have games for fun and that is why we have ages on the games to see if you can buy it. It is the parents fault if they buy the game for the child. My rebuttal is that studies show that video games influence people at ages 4-80 years old. I got this evidence from the website called serendip.brymawr.edu.